2009 IEEE International Conference on
Systems, Man, and Cybernetics |
![]() |
Abstract
One of the greatest challenges in accurately modeling
a human system is the integration of dynamic, fine-grained
information in a meaningful way. A model must allow for
reasoning in the face of uncertain and incomplete information and
be able to provide an easy to understand explanation of why the
system is behaving as it is. To date, work in multi-agent systems
has failed to come close to capturing these critical elements.
Much of the problem is due the fact that most theories about the
behavior of such a system are not computational in nature, they
come from the social sciences. It is very difficult to successfully get
from these qualitative social theories to meaningful computational
models of the same phenomena.
We focus on analysis of human populations where discerning
the opinions of the members of the populace is integral in
understanding behavior on an individual and group level. Our
approach allows the easy aggregation and de-aggregation of
information from multiple sources and in multiple data types
into a unified model. We also present an algorithm that can be
used to automatically detect the variables in the model that are
causing changes in opinion over time. This gives our model the
capability to explain why swings in opinion may be experienced in
a principled, computational manner. An example is given based
on the 2008 South Carolina Democratic Primary election. We
show that our model is able to provide both predictions of how the
population may vote and why they are voting this way. Our results
compare favorably with the election results and our explanation
of the changing trends compares favorably with the explanations
given by experts.